"We celebrated our biggest quarter in history, but my heart sank when I realized we were three days away from missing payroll. We were cash-poor, despite being revenue-rich. It was the ultimate financial paradox: success creating failure."
1. The Challenge: A Liquidity Crisis Driven by Sales
The client, a logistics and distribution firm we'll call Global Distribution Solutions (GDS), experienced a rapid and unexpected surge in demand for its industrial supply chain services. To capture this market share, the sales team offered generous credit terms (Net 60 to Net 90) to secure large, high-value corporate contracts. While this boosted the company's Accounts Receivable (AR) to record levels, it created a devastating pinch on its working capital. GDS was obliged to pay its suppliers and operational costs on much shorter terms (Net 30) to keep the supply chain running. The result was a widening gap in the Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC), where cash was leaving the company 30-60 days before the revenue from those goods arrived.
The company's P&L looked fantastic, but its balance sheet was collapsing under the strain of funding its own sales growth. They needed immediate cash to cover short-term liabilities (payroll, utilities, fuel) while waiting for large customer checks to clear.
2. The Diagnosis: The Unhealthy Cash Conversion Cycle
A specialized advisory team immediately diagnosed the classic "Growth Trap." A detailed analysis of the company's working capital components confirmed the severity of the CCC problem.
Working Capital Metrics Before Intervention:
- Average Collection Period (DSO): 78 days (Target: 45 days).
- Average Payment Period (DPO): 32 days (Target: 60 days).
- Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC): An unsustainable 55-day gap, meaning GDS had to internally fund its operations for nearly two months before being paid.
- Credit Policy Drift: The sales team had no formal credit approval mechanism and was granting 90-day terms without assessing the clients' payment history or credit risk.
3. The Strategy: Bridging the Liquidity Gap
The strategy centered on two core objectives: shortening the collection period (getting paid faster) and lengthening the payment period (paying slower).
Phase 1: Collection Acceleration
The firm implemented a strict, four-tier credit policy. New high-risk clients were limited to Net 30 or required a small upfront deposit. Simultaneously, they automated the invoicing and collections process, deploying follow-up systems at the 15, 30, and 45-day marks, complete with early-payment discount incentives (2% Net 10). This cultural shift emphasized cash collection as the sales team's final key performance indicator.
Phase 2: Supplier Synchronization
Armed with data showing GDS's new stability and long-term contract growth, the advisory team successfully renegotiated terms with GDS's three largest suppliers, extending their average payment period from 30 days to 60 days. This required presenting a detailed, transparent cash flow forecast that mitigated the suppliers' risk.
4. The Result: Liquidity and Accelerated Growth
The reforms had an immediate, stabilizing effect. Within six months, GDS's financial health was fundamentally transformed:
- DSO was reduced from 78 days to 48 days.
- DPO was extended from 32 days to 58 days.
- The Cash Conversion Cycle reversed from a 55-day deficit to a 10-day surplus.
This turnaround means GDS now receives cash 10 days before they have to pay their suppliers, completely eliminating the internal funding gap. The company achieved the twin goals of aggressive sales growth and robust financial liquidity, allowing them to confidently scale operations without fear of a self-inflicted cash crisis.
Return to Success Stories